Asking the right questions: Scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services
© Anderson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 15 October 2007
Accepted: 09 July 2008
Published: 09 July 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 Oct 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|19 Nov 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tara Lamont|
|27 Mar 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stephen Robert Hanney|
|9 May 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Stuart Anderson|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|9 May 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|13 Jun 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Stuart Anderson|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|13 Jun 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|27 Jun 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Stuart Anderson|
|Resubmission - Version 7|
|27 Jun 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 7|
|9 Jul 2008||Editorially accepted|
|9 Jul 2008||Article published||10.1186/1478-4505-6-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.