Table 2 Assessment of sex/gender sensitivity in each section of the selected articles – Synopsis of the results
Reference | Background | Study design | Statistical analysis | Discussion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Bambra et al. [50] | ++ | + | ○ | ++ |
2. Berntsson et al. [51] | ++ | ++ | + | ++ |
3. Boone-Heinonen & Gordon-Larsen [52] | + | ○ | + | + |
4. Borrell et al. [53] | ○ | ○ | + | ++ |
5. Escribà-Agüir et al. [54] | ++ | ++ | + | + |
6. Escribà-Agüir & Artazcoz [55] | ++ | ++ | + | + |
7. Gissler et al. [56] | + | ○ | ○ | + |
8. Haukenes et al. [57] | ○ | ○ | ○ | + |
9. Harryson et al. [58] | + | ++ | + | + |
10. Hernanadez & Pressler [59] | + | ○ | + | + |
11. Heys et al. [60] | ++ | ++ | + | ○ |
12. Hollander et al. [61] | ++ | ○ | + | + |
13. Ikeda et al. [62] | ++ | + | + | ++ |
14. Kavanagh et al. [63] | ++ | + | ++ | ++ |
15. King et al. [64] | ○ | ○ | ○ | + |
16. Kolarcik et al. [65] | ○ | + | + | + |
17. Kovess-Masfety et al. [66] | ++ | + | + | ++ |
18. Mansdotter et al. [67] | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
19. Matheson et al. [68] | ++ | + | ++ | ++ |
20. Matheson et al. [69] | ++ | + | ++ | + |
21. Matheson et al. [70] | + | + | + | + |
22. Matheson et al. [71] | + | + | ○ | + |
23. McCormack et al. [72] | + | ○ | + | ○ |
24. Milner et al. [73] | + | ○ | + | + |
25. Mindell et al. [74] | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ |
26. Nante et al. [75] | ++ | + | + | ++ |
27. Niclasen et al. [76] | + | ○ | ○ | ○ |
28. Pitel et al. [77] | + | ○ | + | + |
29. Ratner et al. [78] | + | + | + | + |
30. Regidor et al. [79] | ○ | ○ | + | ○ |
31. Rigby & Dorling [80] | ○ | ○ | ○ | ++ |
32. Rosenstock et al. [81] | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
33. Ruiz-Cantero et al. [82] | ++ | ++ | + | + |
34. Staehelin et al. [83] | ++ | ○ | ○ | ++ |
35. Strand et al. [84] | + | ○ | + | ++ |
36. Värnik et al. [85] | ++ | ○ | ○ | + |
37. Vigna-Taglianti et al. [86] | + | ○ | ○ | ++ |