Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Understanding relevance of health research: considerations in the context of research impact assessment

  • Mark J. Dobrow1Email author,
  • Fiona A. Miller1,
  • Cy Frank2 and
  • Adalsteinn D. Brown1
Health Research Policy and Systems201715:31

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0188-6

Received: 27 September 2016

Accepted: 7 March 2017

Published: 17 April 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Sep 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Steven Wooding
6 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Buxton
27 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Mark J. Dobrow
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
7 Mar 2017 Editorially accepted
17 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12961-017-0188-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto
(2)
Alberta Innovates - Health Solutions

Advertisement