Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
---|---|
Published in English | Not published in English, or no English full text available |
Conducted original/primary research | Commentary, editorial, policy submission, book report, annual report, political party platform or news article; presents model with no empirical data; referred to other studies without conducting original research |
Focused on the practice of lobbying or the quantity of lobby firms and lobbyists. This included studies that: (1) Measured a lobbying activity undertaken to influence public servants (e.g., meetings, submissions, committee participation) (2) Measured lobbying expenses (3) Measured the population of lobby firms/lobbyists (e.g., registration counts) | Only examined mechanisms to address lobbying (e.g., disclosure requirements); only analysed the influence of lobbying (not the practice); only analysed strategies targeting the public (e.g., grassroots campaigns, community coalition building, direct mail services); only analysed media framing strategies; only measured the revolving door (movement between public and private sector); focused mainly on other political strategies, with lobbying only a minor component of the study (e.g., narrative analysis of tobacco industry political strategies) |
Used publicly available and replicable data (including FOIs subsequently shared in public repositories) | Data sources not public or easily replicable (e.g., investigative journalism, interviews, surveys, participant observation) |
Methods provide reasonable detail regarding data sources and steps taken to access, clean and analyse the data | Methods unexplained, or not described in reasonable detail to enable replication (e.g., “data analysed by author”) |