| Never | Very Rarely/Rarely | Occasionally | Frequently/Very Frequently | Always |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) |
1. How often was relevant research evidence about high-priority policy issues easily available to policymakers? | |||||
a) Copies of articles or reports about primary research on high-priority policy issues were widely disseminated to policymakers working on these issues. | 0 (0.0%) | 14 (51.9%) | 4 (14.8%) | 8 (29.6%) | 1 (3.7%) |
b) Systematic reviews of the research literature on high-priority policy issues were widely disseminated to policymakers working on these issues. | 7 (26.9%) | 10 (38.5%) | 6 (23.1%) | 2 (7.7%) | 1 (3.8%) |
c) Policy briefs that described research evidence about a high-priority problem, options for addressing the problem, and key implementation considerations were widely disseminated to policymakers working on these issues. | 2 (7.7%) | 17 (65.4%) | 3 (11.5%) | 4 (15.4%) | 0 (0.0%) |
d) Policymakers had access to a personal computer with a functional internet connection. | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (11.5%) | 7 (26.9%) | 16 (61.5%) |
e) Policymakers had access to research evidence on high-priority policy issues through a searchable database focused on these issues. | 2 (7.4%) | 12 (44.4%) | 4 (14.8%) | 8 (29.6%) | 1 (3.7%) |
f) Policymakers had access to research evidence on high-priority policy issues through a service operated by researchers and designed to respond in a timely way to questions about these issues. | 5 (18.5%) | 11 (40.7%) | 4 (14.8%) | 6 (22.2%) | 1 (3.7%) |
g) Research evidence concerning high-priority policy issues was available to policymakers. | 1 (3.7%) | 10 (37%) | 9 (33.3%) | 7 (25.9%) | 0 (0.0%) |
2. How often did policymakers and researchers interact in the following ways? | |||||
a) Policymakers interacted with researchers as part of a priority-setting process to identify high-priority policy issues for which primary research and systematic reviews were needed. | 1 (3.7%) | 15 (55.6%) | 6 (22.2%) | 5 (18.5%) | 0 (0.0%) |
b) Policymakers interacted with researchers as part of the process of conducting primary research or systematic reviews about high-priority policy issues. | 0 (0.0%) | 12 (46.2%) | 7 (26.9%) | 7 (26.9%) | 0 (0.0%) |
c) Policymakers interacted with researchers to obtain assistance with finding and using research evidence about high-priority policy issues. | 2 (7.7%) | 8 (30.8%) | 7 (26.9%) | 9 (34.6%) | 0 (0.0%) |
d) Policymakers interacted with researchers through targeted efforts to support research use in policymaking (i.e., a rapid-response service or policy dialogues). | 2 (8.3%) | 17 (70.8%) | 1 (4.2%) | 4 (16.7%) | 0 (0.0%) |
e) Policymakers interacted with researchers on an informal basis (i.e., through membership on committees, attendance at meetings, personal conversations). | 0 (0.0%) | 6 (22.2%) | 9 (33.3%) | 8 (29.6%) | 4 (14.8%) |
3. How often did policymakers develop and demonstrate their capacity to find and use health research evidence in health systems policymaking? | |||||
a) Policymakers participated in training to develop their capacity to find and use research evidence about high-priority policy issues. | 4 (15.4%) | 11 (42.3%) | 6 (23.1%) | 5 (19.2%) | 0 (0.0%) |
b) Policymakers acquired research evidence on high-priority policy issues. | 1 (3.8%) | 12 (46.2%) | 6 (23.1%) | 7 (26.9%) | 0 (0.0%) |
c) Policymakers assessed the quality and local applicability of research evidence on high-priority policy issues. | 6 (23.1%) | 11 (42.3%) | 5 (19.2%) | 4 (15.4%) | 0 (0.0%) |
d) Policymakers identified or created places for research evidence in decision-making processes. | 2 (7.7%) | 14 (53.8%) | 6 (23.1%) | 4 (15.4%) | 0 (0.0%) |