From: The multi-step process of building TB/HIV collaboration in Cambodia
Year | Type^ | Initiating agency | Intervention | Outcome | Challenges |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1993 | I | CENAT | DOTS expansion initiated | Availability of TB treatment increased | Post-conflict environment |
1999 | P | MoH | TB/HIV subcommittee formed | Dialogue initiated | Irregular meetings; limited action |
2002 | P | CENAT and NCHADS | Framework for TB/HIV | First formal agreement | Agreement remained general; technical direction still unclear |
2003 | I | NCHADS | ART initiated under Continuum of Care; OI/ART team included TB physician | Availability of ART increased | Initially low capacity of healthcare system |
2003 | R | NCHADS, CENAT, WHO, FHI, US CDC, JICA | TB/HIV pilot programs | Pilots initiated and results published; operational challenges highlighted | Commitment to national roll-out not present prior to pilots, and relative roles of CENAT and NCHADS were not yet defined |
2006 | P | CENAT and NCHADS | SoP on HIV testing of TB patients and TB screening of PLHIV | Relative roles of CENAT and NCHADS defined; OI/ART teams screened PLHIV for TB and CENAT used 3 options to increase screening of TB patients for HIV | Technical questions remained, i.e., research was needed to define best practices for ART initiation and TB symptom screening prior to IPT |
2009 | R | CENAT, NCHADS, US CDC, Cambodian Health Committee and research partners | CAMELIA and ID-TB/HIV studies completed and results disseminated in Cambodia | Results define when ART should be started in TB patients and what symptom screen to use in PLHIV prior to IPT | Very few challenges; rapid adoption of findings into field practice |
2010 | P | TWG for TB/HIV, NCHADS with CENAT | 3Is SOP completed | Roll-out of 3Is, based on detailed roles and responsibilities | TB screening of existing PLHIV may put burden on TB diagnostic services |
2010 | P | CENAT, NCHADS | Revised TB/HIV framework | All TB/HIV policy captured in a single document |