Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Impact of clinical and health services research projects on decision-making: a qualitative study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Sep 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anna Gagliardi
19 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - kathryn graham
8 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Maite Solans-Domenech
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Maite Solans-Domenech
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
28 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anna Gagliardi
5 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Maite Solans-Domenech
Resubmission - Version 5
5 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
23 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anna Gagliardi
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
26 Apr 2013 Editorially accepted
10 May 2013 Article published 10.1186/1478-4505-11-15

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement