From: Resurrecting social infrastructure as a determinant of urban tuberculosis control in Delhi, India
New TB patients (all forms of TB) per 100,000 populationcregistered under the Revised National TB Control Program in Delhi (2001–2011) | New smear positive TB patients per 100,000 populationcregistered under the Revised National TB Control Program in Delhi (2001–2011) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | New TB patientsa | Rate (per 100,000) | 95% Confidence interval (±) | Log rate | New smear positive TB patientsb | Rate (per 100,000) | 95% Confidence interval (±) | Log rate |
2001–2002 | 31,718 | 229.84 | 2.53 | 5.437 | 11,794 | 85.46 | 1.54 | 4.448 |
2002–2003 | 31,856 | 229.18 | 2.54 | 5.435 | 12,119 | 87.19 | 1.56 | 4.468 |
2003–2004 | 34,121 | 229.00 | 2.62 | 5.434 | 12,384 | 83.11 | 1.58 | 4.420 |
2004–2005 | 33,155 | 215.29 | 2.59 | 5.372 | 12,604 | 81.84 | 1.60 | 4.405 |
2005–2006 | 34,778 | 217.36 | 2.65 | 5.382 | 12,554 | 78.46 | 1.59 | 4.363 |
2006–2007 | 36,873 | 229.03 | 2.73 | 5.434 | 13,717 | 85.20 | 1.66 | 4.445 |
2007–2008 | 38,261 | 230.49 | 2.78 | 5.440 | 13,768 | 82.94 | 1.67 | 4.418 |
2008–2009 | 37,532 | 219.49 | 2.75 | 5.391 | 14,002 | 81.88 | 1.68 | 4.405 |
2009–2010 | 39,222 | 222.85 | 2.81 | 5.407 | 14,207 | 80.72 | 1.69 | 4.391 |
2010–2011 | 37,655 | 213.99 | 2.76 | 5.354 | 13,245 | 75.26 | 1.66 | 4.336 |
 |  |  | Average | 5.408 |  |  | Average | 4.410 |
 |  |  | Slope | -0.005 |  |  | Slope | -0.009 |
 |  |  | Standard deviation | 0.003 |  |  | Standard deviation | 0.003 |
 |  |  | 95% Confidence interval (±) | 0.014 |  |  | 95% Confidence interval (±) | 0.015 |
 |  |  | Pearson’s coefficient | -0.557 |  |  | Pearson’s coefficient | -0.749 |
 |  |  | P value | 0.050* |  |  | P value | 0.006** |
(one-tailed) | (one-tailed) |