Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of government commitment to HIV monitoring and evaluation systems among low- and middle-income countries who completed the NCPI questionnaires in 2006, 2008, and 2010

From: A decade of investments in monitoring the HIV epidemic: how far have we come? A descriptive analysis

  

2006

2008

2010

  

N1

Score

N1

Score

N1

Score

Government commitment

HIV M&E plan

High-burden LMICs

22

64%

22

95%

22

95%

(44–83)

(89–100)

(86–100)

Other LMICs

46

61%

56

83%

55

83%

(50–72)

(75–91)

(75–91)

HIV M&E plan budget

High-burden LMICs

20

78%

22

98%

21

95%

(58–97)

(93–100)

(85–100)

Other LMICs

40

65%

52

75%

39

78%

(51–79)

(66–84)

(65–91)

Secured funding for HIV M&E plan budget

High-burden LMICs

16

69%

20

70%

20

60%

(43–94)

(48–92)

(36–84)

Other LMICs

25

72%

39

69%

28

43%

(53–91)

(54–84)

(23–62)

HIV M&E expenditure monitoring2

High-burden LMICs

–

–

–

–

20

80%

(61–99)

Other LMICs

–

–

–

–

25

80%

(63–97)

HIV M&E framework present in national strategic plan2

High-burden LMICs

–

–

22

100%

22

91%

(78–100)

Other LMICs

–

–

55

91%

56

93%

(83–99)

(86–100)

Government commitment score

High-burden LMICs

22

65%

22

88%

22

81%

(49–81)

(80–96)

(70–92)

Other LMICs

46

57%

56

72%

55

65%

   

(47–68)

 

(65–80)

 

(59–72)

  1. Note: Confidence levels above 100% have been capped at 100%.
  2. 1Indicates the number of countries with a response for that question.
  3. 2Excluded from calculation of domain score as the question was not asked in all three reporting cycles.