A decade of investments in monitoring the HIV epidemic: how far have we come? A descriptive analysis

Table 5 Monitoring and evaluation system performance 2006–2010, as measured through country-reported UNGASS data

		2006		2008		2010
		N¹	%²	N¹	%²	N¹	%²
			(95% CI)		(95% CI)		(95% CI)
HIV M&E system performance
Population-based indicator stream	High-burden LMICs	11	50%	20	91%	21	95%
	High-burden LMICs	11	(29–71)	20	(79–100)	21	(87–100)
	Other LMICs	11	20%	53	95%	47	84%
	Other LMICs	11	(3–36)	53	(85–100)	47	(69–99)
Key population indicator stream	High-burden LMICs	5	23%	15	68%	16	73%
	High-burden LMICs	5	(5–40)	15	(49–88)	16	(54–91)
	Other LMICs	28	50%	45	80%	46	82%
	Other LMICs	28	(29–71)	45	(64–97)	46	(66–98)
Service delivery indicator stream	High-burden LMICs	18	82%	22	100%	22	100%
	High-burden LMICs	18	(66–98)	22	100%	22	100%
	Other LMICs	23	41%	56	100%	56	100%
	Other LMICs	23	(21–62)	56	100%	56	100%
Sex disaggregated data on antiretroviral therapy³	High-burden LMICs	18	82%	–	–	19	86%
	High-burden LMICs	18	(66–98)	–	–	19	(72–100)
	Other LMICs	35	63%	–	–	44	79%
	Other LMICs	35	(42–83)	–	–	44	(61–96)
HIV M&E performance score	High-burden LMICs	11	52%	19	86%	20	89%
	High-burden LMICs	11	(34–69)	19	(73–100)	20	(77–100)
	Other LMICs	21	37%	51	92%	50	89%
			(17–57)		(81–100)		(75–100)

Note: Confidence levels above 100% have been capped at 100%.
¹Indicates the number of countries with a response for that group of questions.
²Percent of 22 high-burden LMICs/56 other LMICs submitting any data for each indicator stream.
³Excluded from calculation of domain score as the question was not asked in all three reporting cycles.

ISSN: 1478-4505