A systematic review of Health Technology Assessment tools in sub-Saharan Africa: methodological issues and implications
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|26 Jun 2014||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|22 Jul 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joseph Mathew|
|13 Sep 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lou Garrison|
|3 Nov 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Christine Kriza|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|3 Nov 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Nov 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lou Garrison|
|20 Nov 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Christine Kriza|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 Nov 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 Nov 2014||Editorially accepted|
|2 Dec 2014||Article published||10.1186/1478-4505-12-66|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.