From: An inquiry into good hospital governance: A New Zealand-Czech comparison
Czech Republic | New Zealand | |
---|---|---|
Governing bodies | State hospitals – no board of directors or supervisory board Municipal hospitals governed by board of directors. Members are hospital employees, municipal representatives and business people. Different number of members. | Public hospitals divided into 21 District Health Boards (DHBs), which serve as Boards of Directors for their hospitals. Some are hospital employees and some are self-employed or employed by other organisations 11 members per DHB |
Membership of a governing body | State hospitals – no governing body. Municipality hospitals – members appointed by town and municipality officials. | 7 members elected through public vote every 3 years, 4 are appointed by the Minister of Health (MoH). At least 2 members must be Maori. |
Member's pay | Usually small fixed pay for a meeting. (Data not available). | Approx. US$15,000 annually. |
Service delivery and financial targets | Vaguely set by the ministry, town or district. | Set by DHB Funding and Performance Directorate. |
Accountability of governing body | Indirect. | Subject to 'public' control |
Competence of a hospital director | High competence and high autonomy over both medical and financial results. | Hospital CEO has high status and is a top level executive appointment |
Accountability of a director | Moderate financial involvement in potential profits. Threat of redundancy. | CEO is accountable to board for overall financial results and service delivery performance |
Controlling body | State hospitals – ministries: low direct involvement, subject to political changes, unfocused. Municipality hospitals – town and district representations: low involvement, subject to political changes, unfocused. | DHB Funding and Performance Directorate and Ministry of Health, subject to political changes, focused. |