Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 16. Evaluation
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|7 Apr 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|12 Apr 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martin Eccles|
|20 Apr 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Merrick Zwarenstein|
|11 May 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Metin Gulmezoglu|
|25 Sep 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Andy Oxman|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|25 Sep 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|2 Oct 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Andy Oxman|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|2 Oct 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Oct 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martin Eccles|
|3 Oct 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Merrick Zwarenstein|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|8 Dec 2006||Editorially accepted|
|8 Dec 2006||Article published||10.1186/1478-4505-4-28|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.