Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 16. Evaluation

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Apr 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Apr 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Eccles
20 Apr 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Merrick Zwarenstein
11 May 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Metin Gulmezoglu
25 Sep 2006 Author responded Author comments - Andy Oxman
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Sep 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Oct 2006 Author responded Author comments - Andy Oxman
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Oct 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Oct 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Eccles
3 Oct 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Merrick Zwarenstein
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
8 Dec 2006 Editorially accepted
8 Dec 2006 Article published 10.1186/1478-4505-4-28

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement