Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Is U.S. health care an appropriate system? A strategic perspective from systems science

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Jul 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Aug 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Manfred Drack
1 Oct 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bryony Soper
17 Oct 2008 Author responded Author comments - Ivo P. Janecka
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Oct 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Nov 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bryony Soper
19 Nov 2008 Author responded Author comments - Ivo P. Janecka
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Nov 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Dec 2008 Author responded Author comments - Ivo P. Janecka
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Dec 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
11 Dec 2008 Author responded Author comments - Ivo P. Janecka
Resubmission - Version 6
11 Dec 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
2 Jan 2009 Editorially accepted
2 Jan 2009 Article published 10.1186/1478-4505-7-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement