This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Progress along developmental tracks for electronic health records implementation in the United States
© Hollar; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 19 September 2007
Accepted: 16 March 2009
Published: 16 March 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|19 Sep 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|12 Oct 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Urbano|
|21 Oct 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Scott|
|18 Feb 2009||Author responded||Author comments - David Hollar|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|18 Feb 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Feb 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Urbano|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Mar 2009||Author responded||Author comments - David Hollar|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|9 Mar 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|11 Mar 2009||Author responded||Author comments - David Hollar|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|11 Mar 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|16 Mar 2009||Editorially accepted|
|16 Mar 2009||Article published||10.1186/1478-4505-7-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.