Table 1 Coverage, respondents' details and discussion topics for the four rounds of data collection.
| Â | Â | Coverage | Respondent details | Â | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Round | Date | Plan | Actual | Cadre | No | TOPICS |
1 | Aug-Sep '05 | 64 | 46 (72%) | District MkV implementers - Health | 18 | -training, planning, reporting and perceived successes and challenges of the first implementation year of MkV2 |
| Â | Â | Â | Â | District MkV implementers - Education | 28 | Â |
2 | Jun-Nov '06 | 44 | 41 (93%) | Regional officials | 6 | - Knowledge of key policies (source of information, content, structure) |
| Â | Â | Â | Â | District officials | 8 | -Understanding of Multisectoral approaches |
| Â | Â | Â | Â | District MkV implementers | 23 | -Activities in their department and relation to HIV/AIDS and ASRH |
| Â | Â | Â | Â | NGO staff | 4 | -Expenditure profile in the district for AIDS/ASRH related activities. -Resource allocation (time) to MkV activities |
3 | May '07 | 116 | 69 (59%) | District officials | 17 | -Status of ASRH in districts -Understanding of MkV2 programme |
| Â | Â | Â | Â | District MkV implementers | 52 | -Acceptance of MkV2 programme -resource allocation to ASRH in districts -structures/plans in place to continue implementation of MkV activities |
4 | Jul-Aug '07 | 46 | 44 (96%) | District officials | 26 | -planned, perceived and actual role of the MkV technical assistance (TA) model |
| Â | Â | Â | Â | District MkV implementers | 8 | -Planned, perceived and actual benefits of the MkV TA model -Implementation status of the district AIDS response |
| Â | Â | Â | Â | MkV team members | 10 | -Facilitating and inhibitory factors in the implementation of MkV and the TA model |