Skip to main content

Table 2 Use of evaluation findings and processes for 2009 and 2011

From: A qualitative case study of evaluation use in the context of a collaborative program evaluation strategy in Burkina Faso

EPs

Findings use

 

Instrumental findings use 2009

HS, EE

Avoid previous pitfalls

HS

Identify program malfunctions

HS, MoH, EE

Identify and implement locally sound and applicable solutions

HS, EE

Prepare and disseminate presentations, proposals, articles, policy briefs

 

Instrumental findings use 2011

HS, AP

Improve practices and take decisions

HS, MoH

Identify, explain and plan for certain situations

 

Conceptual findings use 2009

HS

Provide external perspective on the program and its effects

HS, MoH

Understand program malfunctions

 

Conceptual findings use 2011

HS, AP

Understand effects of exemption and validate its mission

HS, MoH

Validate exemption program and boost team motivation

HS

Change perceptions of exemption program and of program evaluation

MoH, ER

Foster understanding of field reality and clinical data, cultivate a proactive and inquisitive approach

 

Persuasive findings use 2009

HS, MoH

Validate exemption, promote collaboration with regional MoH

 

Persuasive findings use 2011

HS, ER, AP

Support advocacy strategy to persuade policymakers and funders

HS, EE, ER

More persuasive use needs to target politicians

EP

Process use

 

Instrumental process uste 2009

HS, EE, MoH

Improve evaluation appreciation and influence decisions (seeking funds, evaluation design, beneficiary criteria)

HS

Cultivate new collaborations and networks

 

Instrumental process use 2011

HS, EE, MoH

Enhance EPs’ networks, promote partnerships and evaluation activities

MoH

Foster inclusion of usual outsiders to engage and resolve challenges

 

Conceptual process use 2009

HS, MoH, EE

Facilitate capacity building (e.g. evaluation methodological, conceptual, technical understanding; humanitarian health field)

HS

Prompt curiosity and reflexive attitude; boost confidence

HS, EE, MoH

Facilitate communications increasingly tainted by scientific values and expectations

EE

Prompt cognitive changes facilitating evaluation use

 

Conceptual process use 2011

HS, EE, MoH

Increase interest and capacities in exemption and in program evaluation

HS, EE

Change logic fostering receptivity, ability and yearning for scientific rigor

  1. AP, Advocacy partner; EE, External evaluators; EP, Evaluation partner; ER, ECHO representative; HS, HELP Staff; MoH, Ministry of Health.