Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of participant evaluations (response rate: 91% (31/34))

From: The use of a policy dialogue to facilitate evidence-informed policy development for improved access to care: the case of the Winnipeg Central Intake Service (WCIS)

Question

Agreed or Strongly agreed (n = 26–31)

Background knowledge/presentations

 Presentations provided me with the background knowledge and understanding to contribute to the meeting

90%

Meeting objectives

 Meeting objectives were met

97%

 I understood the material presented

94%

 The meeting was valuable to attend

93%

 My voice was heard when discussing the policy directions

87%

 The policy directions presented reflect the relevant policy considerations for centralised intake

97%

Meeting experience

 The meeting brought together relevant stakeholders

97%

 I had the opportunity to share ideas and issues

93%

 The meeting was relevant to me or my work

97%

 I made at least one new contact

90%

 I plan to act or share learning from the meeting with a colleague not involved with the meeting

83%