Skip to main content

Table 2 Content regarding definitions of vulnerability and detailing the use of qualifying language

From: The concept of ‘vulnerability’ in research ethics: an in-depth analysis of policies and guidelines

 

Policy/Guideline

Explicit definition of vulnerability or vulnerable subjects

Use of qualifying languagea

Intl

 Intl

Declaration of Helsinki

• Some groups and individuals are “particularly vulnerable” ([17], Art. 19)

CIOMS

‘Vulnerability’ refers to a substantial incapacity to protect one’s own interests owing to such impediments as lack of capability to give informed consent, lack of alternative means of obtaining medical care or other expensive necessities, or being a junior or subordinate member of a hierarchical group” ([18], p. 18)

• Persons with serious, potentially disabling or life-threatening diseases are “highly vulnerable” ([18], p. 65)

• Selection of the “least vulnerable” subjects required for research ([18], p. 18)

UNESCO Declaration

• Certain individuals and groups are of “special vulnerability” ([19], Art. 8)

 EU

Clinical Trials Directive

Clinical Trials Regulation

 US, EU, JP, AUS, CA

ICH GCP

Glossary defines vulnerable subjects as “[i]ndividuals whose willingness to volunteer in a clinical trial may be unduly influenced by the expectation, whether justified or not, of benefits associated with participation, or of a retaliatory response from senior members of a hierarchy in case of refusal to participate” ([23], Art. 1.61)

National

 AUS

National Statement

• Where “potential participants [in dependent or unequal relationships] are especially vulnerable” special measures may be required ([23], p. 53)

• Neonates in intensive care have a “unique developmental vulnerability” ([23], p. 56)

• People with a cognitive impairment, intellectual disability, or mental illness have “distinctive vulnerabilities as research participants” and are “more-than-usually vulnerable to various forms of discomfort or stress” ([23], p. 58)

 CA

TCPS2

Vulnerability – A diminished ability to fully safeguard one’s own interests in the context of a specific research project. This may be caused by limited decision-making capacity or limited access to social goods, such as rights, opportunities and power. Individuals or groups may experience vulnerability to different degrees and at different times, depending on their circumstances. See also ‘Autonomy’” ([24], p. 210)

• Participants, researchers, and research ethics board members may be rendered “more vulnerable” during publicly declared emergencies ([24], p. 90)

• “The least organisationally developed communities are the most vulnerable to exploitation” ([24], p. 130)

• Participants may be “in highly vulnerable circumstances” because of social or legal stigmatisation ([24], p. 141)

 UK

Research Governance Framework

 US

Belmont Report

• “Also, inducements that would ordinarily be acceptable may become undue influences if the subject is especially vulnerable” ([26], Part C.1)

Common Rule

  1. aQualifying language captures nuances about degrees or types of vulnerability
  2. Intl international, EU European Union, AUS Australia, CA Canada, JP Japan, UK United Kingdom, US United States, CIOMS Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences, TCPS2 Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans, ICH GCP International Conference on Harmonisation, Good Clinical Practice