Evidence-based policymaking is not like evidence-based medicine, so how far should you go to bridge the divide between evidence and policy?
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Dec 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|24 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Catherine Needham|
|27 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Matthews|
|6 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Paul Cairney|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Mar 2017||Editorially accepted|
|26 Apr 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12961-017-0192-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.