Skip to main content

Table 3 Users’ preferences for the alternative versions of the revised rapid response brief

From: Policymaker experiences with rapid response briefs to address health-system and technology questions in Uganda

Which participant

Preference

Explanation why (illustrated with quotes if possible)

User experience category

Respondent 1

Version 3

Less crowded face/first page

Findability

Respondent 2

Version 2

Version 3 template looks “deficient” and still has no recommendations

Usability

Respondent 3

Version 2

Version 2 template is fine so long as you keep the document short

Usability

Respondent 4

Version 3

Face page is more attractive – makes the document feel “light”

Findability