Underutilisation of routinely collected data in the HIV programme in Zambia: a review of quantitatively analysed peer-reviewed articles
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Jun 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Jun 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Tendai Munthali|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|17 Jun 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Carlucci|
|2 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Miguel Angel Gonzalez Block|
|27 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Tendai Munthali|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|30 May 2017||Editorially accepted|
|13 Jun 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12961-017-0221-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.