Issues | Number of studies in which the issue is mentioned |
---|---|
Technical issues | |
Poor reporting | 9 |
 Perspective not stated | 7 |
 Methodology not presented in a clear and reproducible manner | 2 |
 Disaggregated result not presented | 1 |
 Funding sources not reported | 1 |
 Ethical issues not discussed | 1 |
Lack of high-quality local clinical data | 7 |
Lack of local utility data | 4 |
Sensitivity analysis not properly characterised | 4 |
Some relevant cost data omitted | 3 |
Incremental analysis not performed | 3 |
Clinical data not based on systematic review | 2 |
Lack of reliable cost data | 2 |
Discounting not performed, if relevant | 2 |
Methodology lacks standard, transparent methods | 2 |
Comparator not appropriate | 1 |
Variations among costs, effects and cost-effectiveness data within and between settings | 1 |
No objective budget constraints or threshold applied | 1 |
No reference case specific to developing contexts | 1 |
Economic evaluation is not included in a formal process to support decision-making process | 1 |
Limited local research capacity | 1 |
Limited local good quality journal with a high standard process of review | 1 |
Misunderstanding between researchers, academia and policy-makers | 1 |