Skip to main content

Table 1 Included papers

From: Frameworks for embedding a research culture in allied health practice: a rapid review

Author,Year

Title

Framework or Model

Study location/Healthcare domain

Participants

Framework development/Study type

Brennan, 2017 [54]

Development and validation of SEER (Seeking, Engaging with and Evaluating Research): a measure of policymakers’ capacity to engage with and use research

SEER Framework

Australia, Health policy-makers

Investigator team (researchers, policy-makers) 150/272 respondents, 57/105 respondents, 9 policy agencies

Item generation and refinement, Literature review and expert consensus survey, Validity and internal consistency survey, Test-retest reliability

Cooke, 2005 [26]

A framework to evaluate research capacity building in health care

Cooke Framework

United Kingdom, Primary care

Not reported

Literature review and expert opinion

Farmer, 2002 [19]

A conceptual model for capacity building in Australian primary health care research

‘Whole system’ Framework

Australia, General practitioners

Not reported

Expert opinion

Fleisher, 2007 [55]

The NCI’s Cancer Information Service’s Research Continuum Framework: integrating research into cancer education practice

CIS Research Continuum Framework

United States, National Cancer Information Service

Not reported

Not reported

Golenko, 2012 [25]

A thematic analysis of the role of the organisation in building allied health research capacity: a senior managers’ perspective

Research Capacity-Building Model

Australia, Allied health managers

Nine semi-structured interviews

Qualitative study with thematic analysis

Gullick, 2016 [56]

Building research capacity and productivity among advanced practice nurses: an evaluation of the Community of Practice model

Wenger’s Community of Practice Model

Australia, Nursing

Six focus groups (25 participants: 2 nurse practitioners; 23 clinical nurse consultants)

Qualitative study with thematic analysis

Holden, 2012 [27]

Validation of the research capacity and culture (RCC) tool: measuring RCC at individual, team and organisation levels

Research Capacity and Culture Tool

Australia, Primary care

Allied health assistants = 3; Dieticians = 10; Occupational therapists = 24; Physiotherapists = 29; Speech pathologists = 10; Social workers = 20; Psychologists = 6; Doctors, nurses = 14

Quantitative methods with factor analysis, test-retest reliability, intra-class correlation

Hulcombe, 2014 [28]

An approach to building research capacity for health practitioners in a public health environment: an organisational perspective

Research Capacity and Culture Building Framework

Australia, Allied health clinicians

Medical laboratory assistants; Nutrition and dietetics; Occupational therapy; Oral health therapists; Physiotherapy; Podiatry; Psychology; Public health practitioners; Radiation therapy

Literature review, stakeholder consultations, expert opinion; Development of health practitioners (Queensland Health) certified agreement (No. 2) (HPEB2) – CA/2011/106

McCance, 2006 [57]

Developing a best practice framework to benchmark research and development activity in nursing and midwifery

Research and Development Best Practice Framework

United Kingdom, Nursing

Not reported

Literature review that included 52 papers and generated six best practice statements

Makkar, 2016 [58]

The development of ORACLe: a measure of an organisation’s capacity to engage in evidence-informed health policy

ORACLe Framework

Australia, Health policy-makers

Nine semi-structured interviews – item content; Six semi-structured interviews – item wording

Literature review to generate items; Qualitative methods with content analysis for key domains; Quantitative methods to develop a scoring system and psychometric testing (n = 24)

Makkar, 2016 [59]

The development of SAGE: A tool to evaluate how policymakers’ engage with and use research in health policymaking

SAGE Framework

Australia, Health policy-makers

65 interviews with policy-makers

Literature review and expert consultation to develop item content and wording; Qualitative methods but not reported; Quantitative methods to develop a scoring system and psychometric testing

Redman, 2015 [22]

The SPIRIT Action Framework: A structured approach to selecting and testing strategies to increase the use of research in policy

SPIRIT Action Framework

Australia, Health policy-makers

Nine semi-structured interviews with policy-makers – item content

Literature review including 106 papers from which items were generated; Qualitative methods with content analysis and a review of framework domains; Expert opinion

Ried, 2006 [60]

Setting directions for capacity building in primary health care: a survey of a research network

SARNet Framework

Australia, Primary healthcare

Allied health = 26General practitioners = 19Health services = 11Nurses = 9Academics = 9Hospital doctors = 7

Qualitative and quantitative methods with unreported design and methods

Whitworth, 2012 [30]

Enhancing research capacity across healthcare and higher education sectors: development and evaluation of an integrated model

Partnership Model

United Kingdom, Speech therapists

Speech and language therapists

Expert opinion from senior managers;

Research ideas were solicited from practitioners; Qualitative methods to explore experiences of the research collaboration

NSW Health, 2001 [23]

A Framework for Building Capacity to Improve Health

RCB Framework

Australia, Primary healthcare

Not reported

Expert opinion

Hotte, 2015 [24]

Building Research Capacity within the British Columbia Health Authorities: health services and policy research support network

Health Authority Capacity-Building Program

Canada, Public health

Not reported

Literature review and identification of six themes