Skip to main content

Table 4 CONITEC reports, by type of recommendation, type of study, type of demand and type of health economic evaluation, 2012–2016 (n = 199)

From: Challenges to decision-making processes in the national HTA agency in Brazil: operational procedures, evidence use and recommendations

Recommendation, by type of study

Internal request

External request

Mixed request

Total

Full HEEa

CA/CD

BIA

No HEE

Full HEEa

CA/CD

BIA

No HEE

Full HEEa

BIA

No HEE

 

Incorporate, n (%)

83 (70.9)

13 (17.3)

5 (71.4)

101 (50.8)

 Full HTA

8

10

2

20

 Mini-HTA

2

9

1

12

 Rapid review

2

2

 Other

44

18

1

1

2

1

67

Do not incorporate, n (%)

17 (14.5)

62 (82.7)

2 (28.6)

81 (40.7)

 Full HTA

2

55

1

58

 Mini-HTA

1

9

2

3

15

 Rapid review

5

1

6

 Other

1

1

2

Maintain/expand/exclude, n (%)

17 (14.5)

17 (8.5)

 Mini-HTA

1

1

 Rapid review

3

3

 Other

1

12

13

 Total, n (%)

117 (100.0)

75 (100.0)

7 (100.0)

199 (100.0)

  1. CONITEC Comissão Nacional de Incorporação de Tecnologias no Sistema Único de Saúde (National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation), EE economic evaluation (cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-utility analysis, cost-benefit analysis or cost-minimisation analysis), CA cost analysis, CD cost description, BIA budget impact analysis
  2. aIncludes a BIA