Table 3 Study 2 (usability) survey results
From: Validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the AGREE-HS
Component | Meana | SD |
|---|---|---|
Instructions | ||
The AGREE-HS instructions are clear | 6.0 | 0.4 |
The AGREE-HS instructions are helpful | 6.3 | 0.4 |
The AGREE-HS instructions are complete | 5.9 | 0.6 |
Overall Usability | ||
The AGREE-HS is easy to use | 6.0 | 0.6 |
I am confident with the ratings I assigned | 5.4 | 0.6 |
Core Items | ||
The item, “Topic” is easy to understand | 6.6 | 0.5 |
The item, “Topic” is easy to apply | 6.6 | 0.5 |
The item, “Participants” is easy to understand | 6.5 | 0.5 |
The item, “Participants” is easy to apply | 6.4 | 0.6 |
The item, “Methods” is easy to understand | 6.2 | 0.6 |
The item, “Methods” is easy to apply | 6.2 | 0.6 |
The item, “Recommendations” is easy to understand | 6.1 | 0.7 |
The item, “Recommendations” is easy to apply | 5.9 | 0.8 |
The item, “Implementability” is easy to understand | 6.0 | 0.6 |
The item, “Implementability” is easy to apply | 5.8 | 0.9 |
The AGREE-HS is complete; the items address all key quality components of HSG | 5.3 | 1.4 |
Overall Assessment Items | ||
The question, “Rate the overall quality of this health systems guidance” is useful | 6.0 | 1.2 |
The question, “I would recommend this health systems guidance for use in the appropriate context” is useful | 5.5 | 1.4 |
Usefulness | ||
The AGREE-HS would be useful for evaluating HSG | 6.4 | 0.5 |
The AGREE-HS would be useful for HSG development and reporting | 6.3 | 1.2 |
The AGREE-HS would be useful for deciding whether or not to implement HSG | 5.7 | 0.6 |
The AGREE-HS adds value to the HSG enterprise | 6.4 | 0.5 |