Skip to main content

Table 3 Paradigmatic implications of research co-production

From: Embracing complexity and uncertainty to create impact: exploring the processes and transformative potential of co-produced research through development of a social impact model

Processes

Impacts

1. Emergence of new ideas, methods and relationships

• Proliferation of new ideas

• Knowledge greater than the sum of its parts

• Recognition and shift towards new research methods to facilitate co-production/integrated knowledge translation

• Greater appreciation of blending techniques within academic institutions

• Stronger links and understanding developed between multiple practice and academic disciplines

• More diverse, enduring and representative engagement in the processes and outcomes of research, e.g. practitioners and service users being named on or leading further research proposals

• Co-design of questions and co-analysis of data aided the transferability and validity of results

• Practitioners and patients explicitly recognised for participating in research and contributing to the development of its outputs

2. Transformative synergies as a result of complex sequences of interventions and interactions

• Questions the nature of knowledge

• Acknowledges, harnesses and perpetuates the democratisation of knowledge

• Challenges the hegemony of reductionist approaches to healthcare research

• Enables research that is dynamic, agile and responsive to local contexts and changing circumstances

• Embraces complexity, dissonance and uncertainty

• Creates rich contextualised evidence from various sources to foster stakeholders’ contextual adroitness and furnish their mindlines with other perspectives

• Harnesses the creativity, expertise, experience and energy of people who provide and use services – this can be politically and practically productive

• Permits redesign and regulation of services to reflect the needs of people who use and work within them

• Places human contextual and emotive issues within research; engages with research users’, generators’ and policy-makers’ emotive and rational selves

• Facilitates an ideological shift towards justice and equality rather than hierarchy and power imbalance in the process and outcomes of research

• We also discerned the potential for co-production to create a virtuous cycle; a recurring cycle of events, in which learning, innovation and improvement are embedded and continuous, and each cycle increases the benefit of the ones before