An analysis of research priority-setting at the World Health Organization – how mapping to a standard template allows for comparison between research priority-setting approaches
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|16 Aug 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Sep 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Cook|
|9 Oct 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sheila Turner|
|25 Oct 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Robert Terry|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|25 Oct 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 Nov 2018||Editorially accepted|
|29 Nov 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12961-018-0391-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.