Focus of research | Region | Partners | Enabling factors | Disabling factors | Lessons learned | Opportunities |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Instituting comprehensive sexuality education in schools | Ghana | International funders, academic institutions, local non-governmental organisations (NGOs) | Good multidisciplinary partnerships | Lack of political interest; backlash due to conservative views of programme | Understand the regional context and adapt key programmes and projects to acceptable language, that deliver the same quality but discourage backlash or conflicts with religious and traditional mores | Stages 1, 4 and 5 |
Establishing a sexual assault care centre | Belgium | Health ministries, teaching hospitals, academic institutions | Extensive background research on subject matter; multidisciplinary team, including service providers and politicians; extensive stakeholder engagement in all parts of the programme implementation process | Working with different political priorities and interests; this sometimes posed as a barrier for effective implementation | Sexual and reproductive health and rights researchers should create strong communication channels between themselves, policy-makers and other relevant actors to ensure that they are accessible and can be easily reached; this approach fosters dialogue and is strategic for promoting translation of research findings and outcomes into policies | Stages 0, 1, 4 and 5 |
Providing comprehensive care to gender-based violence survivors | Kenya | Ministry of Health, local NGOs, national hospitals and staff, international NGO and funders | Long-term partnerships with stakeholders; recognition as expert in the field; community engagement | Lack of resources and initial expertise or political interest | Sustained multi-stakeholder engagement was necessary over a long period for the development of trust, this enhanced the implementation of the project | Stages 1, 4 and 5 |