From: Using narratives to impact health policy-making: a systematic review
Domain | Identified knowledge gaps |
---|---|
Study design | • Lack of experimental or interventional studies on the impact of narratives on health policy-making in real-life settings • Lack of qualitative studies to better understand the knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of policy-makers towards narratives |
Intervention | • Limited evidence on the effects of narratives (as standalone) independent of other interventions (e.g. the use of social media) • Limited description of the narrative intervention (including frequency and duration of exposure, content of narrative (e.g. plot and characters) and perceived credibility of speaker of message) • Lack of evidence comparing different narrative formats (e.g. verbal print, audio, video) and perspectives (first- versus third-person narrative) • Limited description of the framework or theory guiding intervention development • Variations in definitions and operationalisation of narrative information |
Study setting | • Limited evidence on the effects of narratives on health policy-making across cultural settings and countries • Limited evidence from low-income countries • Lack of evidence from the Eastern Mediterranean Region, Region of the Americas and Western Pacific Region |
Population | • Lack of evidence on the effect of moderators, such as policy-makers’ characteristics |
Outcomes | • Limited evidence on the impact on policy stages (in general) • Lack of evidence evaluating the impact on policy evaluation stage • No valid measurement of the impact on the outcomes of interest (e.g. no actual evaluation or assessment based on perceptions of respondents) |