Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of the use of the ‘continuity of care’ concept among articles of Group 2 that mentioned continuity or lack of continuity without a detailed definition, divided by the articles’ nature of analysis (n = 20)

From: How have researchers defined and used the concept of ‘continuity of care’ for chronic conditions in the context of resource-constrained settings? A scoping review of existing literature and a proposed conceptual framework

Items of continuity of care

Total

(n = 20)

System analysis

(n = 7)

Provider perspectives

(n = 6)

Patient perspectives

(n = 6)

Provider and patient perspectives

(n = 1)

Longitudinal care (over time)

11 (55%)

2 (29%)

4 (67%)

4 (67%)

1 (100%)

Longitudinal care (consistency of personnel)

4 (20%)

/

1 (17%)

2 (33%)

1 (100%)

Patient–provider relationship

4 (20%)

/

1 (17%)

2 (33%)

1 (100%)

Coordinated care (across levels and disciplines)

11 (55%)

4 (57%)

4 (67%)

3 (50%)

/

Other (access, quality and adherence)

6 (30%)

3 (43%)

2 (33%)

/

1 (100%)