Indicator | Strength of commitment to the Health in All Policies (HiAP) mandate | Clarity/detail of mandate |
---|---|---|
California (Theoretical replication) | Weak Mandate is an Executive Order with mechanisms in place to ensure accountability; a HiAP Task Force was established to promote the mandate No public funds available for specific initiatives | Unclear Targets and timelines on ad hoc basis benefiting mutual partners through the identification of strategies that address multiple goals at one time while providing ‘co-benefits’; the Department of Health is responsible for implementation, including setting priorities and facilitating ISA; the goal of improving population health through promoting equity and sustainability |
Ecuador (Literal replication) | Strong Mandate is a long-term strategy called ‘Buen Vivir’, backed by the 2008 Constitution with specifically provided targets and timelines; the National Secretariat for Planning and Development (SENPLADES) is the entity that promotes the country’s integrated development at the national and sector-wide levels; funds for initiatives come from the central government | Clear Total of 92 national policies and 138 goals and indicators; HiAP coordinated by SENPLADES at the national level; the National Planning Council (an intersectoral, professional body) serves as the technical secretariat for all levels of government; health is described as an important sector with a work plan (others include green economy, trade, and technology, working together as an overreaching national strategy), helping meet the requirements of “Good Living Objective 3: To Improve the Quality of Life of the Population” |
Finland (Theoretical replication) | Weak Mandate is a long-term strategy called ‘Health 2015’; accountability mechanisms are coordinated by the Advisory Board for Public Health and the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health Limited public funds were allocated for initiatives | Clear Health 2015 outlines 8 goals with a 15-year timeline; the Advisory Board for Public Health and the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health coordinate the implementation and monitoring; HiAP’s aim of enabling people to live longer and healthier lives while reducing health inequalities within the country |
Norway (Literal replication) | Strong Mandate is a long-term strategy called National Strategy to Reduce Social Inequalities in Health; accountability mechanisms include annual review and reporting; an interministerial committee was created and initiatives were incorporated into the national budget | Clear Objectives clearly stated but without clear timelines; the Directorate of Health is responsible for coordinating sectors and monitoring/reporting on progress; HiAP is framed around social equity but focused on reducing health inequities |
Scotland (Theoretical replication) | Weak Mandate were pilot strategies called ‘Equally Well’ and ‘Achieving our Potential’; accountability mechanisms include reporting and evaluation of Equally Well conducted by local test sites and the Ministerial Task Force; a Ministerial Task Force on Health Inequalities was created to support HiAP; limited public grant funding for pilot projects was provided | Clear Achieving our Potential includes specific targets; Equally Well does not provide clear targets and timelines; regular evaluations at a set timeline were laid out, without targets (although the nature of test site work including emergent objectives/activities renders that somewhat irrelevant); each Equally Well test site had a coordinator Ministerial Task Force responsible for evaluation; Equally Well is clear about improving health equity |
Thailand (Literal replication) | Strong Mandate derives from the National Health Act; accountability mechanisms derived from the Thai constitution include the public’s right to sue government organisations that fail to comply with regulations about impact assessment; a National Health Assembly and National Health Commission were created to support HiAP | Unclear Health Impact Assessment (HIA) is a key part of policy coordination in Thailand (however, no clear targets or timelines for the use of HIA were found); the National Health Commission, which is an intersectoral governmental body, approves a budget specific for the National Health Commission Office, which is largely responsible for HiAP-related activities in Thailand; one principle of HIA use in the National Health Act is justice in order to “reduce inequity and injustice in respect of health” |