Skip to main content

Table 2 Published studies meeting inclusion criteria by key domains of focus reported on in the study (per Donabedian [24], as described above)

From: How do organisations implement research impact assessment (RIA) principles and good practice? A narrative review and exploratory study of four international research funding and administrative organisations

Short reference

Research organisation forming focus of study

Reflects and/or reports on …

structures of RIA?

processes of RIA?

outcomes of RIA?

Searles et al. ‘An approach to measuring and encouraging research translation and research impact’ [25]

Hunter Medical Research Institute, Australia

✔

✔

 

Greenhalgh et al. ‘Maximising value from a United Kingdom Biomedical Research Centre: study protocol’ [26]

National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, United Kingdom

✔

  

Trochim et al. ‘Evaluation guidelines for the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs)’ [27]

National Institutes of Health (CTSA funding programme), US

✔

  

Rubio et al. ‘Developing Common Metrics for the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs): Lessons Learned’ [28]

National Institutes of Health (CTSA programme), US

✔

✔

✔

McLean et al. ‘Understanding the performance and impact of public knowledge translation funding interventions: protocol for an evaluation of Canadian Institutes of Health Research knowledge translation funding programs’ [29]

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (knowledge translation funding programme), Canada

✔

✔

Â