Skip to main content

Table 2 Published studies meeting inclusion criteria by key domains of focus reported on in the study (per Donabedian [24], as described above)

From: How do organisations implement research impact assessment (RIA) principles and good practice? A narrative review and exploratory study of four international research funding and administrative organisations

Short referenceResearch organisation forming focus of studyReflects and/or reports on …
structures of RIA?processes of RIA?outcomes of RIA?
Searles et al. ‘An approach to measuring and encouraging research translation and research impact’ [25]Hunter Medical Research Institute, Australia 
Greenhalgh et al. ‘Maximising value from a United Kingdom Biomedical Research Centre: study protocol’ [26]National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, United Kingdom  
Trochim et al. ‘Evaluation guidelines for the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs)’ [27]National Institutes of Health (CTSA funding programme), US  
Rubio et al. ‘Developing Common Metrics for the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs): Lessons Learned’ [28]National Institutes of Health (CTSA programme), US
McLean et al. ‘Understanding the performance and impact of public knowledge translation funding interventions: protocol for an evaluation of Canadian Institutes of Health Research knowledge translation funding programs’ [29]Canadian Institutes of Health Research (knowledge translation funding programme), Canada