Skip to main content

Table 1 Criteria for publishing a case report/case series

From: The value of case reports in democratising evidence from resource-limited settings: results of an exploratory survey

Criterion

Highly important

Somewhat important

Not so important

NA

… a neglected public health issue

59%

21%

3%

17%

… an unexpected treatment outcome

55%

23%

4%

18%

… a rare presentation of a common condition

52%

27%

5%

16%

… a rare condition

51%

25%

7%

17%

… an unusual treatment protocol

49%

26%

6%

19%

… an issue of differential diagnosis

42%

32%

8%

18%

… an ethical dilemma

41%

30%

11%

18%

… case management of pedagogical value

39%

34%

9%

18%

… advocacy for patient groups

35%

31%

14%

20%

  1. Other criteria making a case report ‘worth publishing’ that were cited, included (according to importance):
  2. - If it illustrates how complex cases can be managed with very limited resources, with non-specialised/overextended staff, and/or in a sustainable way
  3. - If it reports re/emerging diseases, new disease patterns
  4. - If it contributes to improved quality of care, new models of treatment
  5. - If other (statistical) evidence is lacking; if it can be used to justify larger studies
  6. - If the condition is associated with cultural practices or ethnic groups
  7. - If the condition is associated with high mortality
  8. - If the case shows up success points or insufficiencies of the health system in place
  9. - If the case is about the management of multiple morbidities