Table 2 Number of participants indicating ‘strongly agree’ or ‘agree’ in assessing value of training modules, by training group and Kirkpatrick levels of training evaluation
From: Outcomes from Indo–United States–Egypt tri-national psychiatric research training programmes
TPPG n = 5 | TNTPPG n = 4 | CFRT (in progress) n = 30a | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Level 1: Reaction | Value of training programme | 5 (100%) | 4 (100%) | 28 (93%) |
Value of mentors | 5 (100%) | 4 (100%) | 22 (73%) | |
Level 2: Learning | Value of proposal development | 5 (100%) | 4 (100%) | 24 (80%) |
Value of ethics module | 5 (100%) | 4 (100%) | 22 (73%) | |
Value of didactic coursework | 4 (80%) | 3 (75%) | NAb | |
Level 3: Behaviour | New job or better research position | 3 (60%) | 2 (50%) | 5 (17%) |
Collaboration with mentors | 4 (80%) | 2 (50%) | 14 (47%) | |
Collaboration with trainees | 1 (20%) | 2 (50%) | 7 (23%) | |
Training alignment with research | 4 (80%) | 4 (100%) | 17 (57%) | |
Deepened interest in psychiatric genetics | 3 (60%) | 2 (50%) | 17 (57%) | |
Level 4: Outcomes | Publications | 5 (100%) | 4 (100%) | 10 (33%) |