Skip to main content

Table 2 General characteristics of included rapid reviews

From: Assessing how information is packaged in rapid reviews for policy-makers and other stakeholders: a cross-sectional study

Characteristics

All (n = 103)

Journal

published (n = 52)

Non-journal published (n = 51)

Country of corresponding author or producer, n (%)

 Canada

42 (41)

12 (23)

30 (59)

 United Kingdom

21 (20)

20 (38)

1 (2)

 Australia

14 (14)

4 (8)

10 (20)

 United States

10 (10)

3 (6)

7 (14)

 Belgium

3 (3)

2 (4)

1 (1)

 Scotland

3 (3)

1 (2)

2 (4)

 Italy

2 (2)

2 (4)

0

 China, Denmark, Germany, Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, Spain, Sweden, Taiwana

1 (1)

1 (2)

0

List of authors cited, n (%)

89 (86)

52 (100)

37 (73)

Reported funding, n (%)

67 (65)

39 (75)

28 (55)

Funding source, n

 External, peer-reviewed grant

8

6

2

 External, non-commercial (fee for service)

47

22

25

 External, commercial (fee for service)

2

2

0

 Internal

1

0

1

 Specified no funding received

9

9

0

Purpose or rationale for RR conveyed by the authors

63 (61)

33 (63)

30 (59)

Time to conduct the RR reported, n (%)

6 (6)

3 (6)

3 (6)

 4 weeks

2

0

2

 8 weeks

1

1

0

 17 weeks

1

0

1

 24 weeks

1

1

0

 32 weeks

1

1

0

Main intervention, n (%)

 Pharmacological

17 (17)

4 (8)

13 (25)

 Non-pharmacological

57 (55)

29 (56)

28 (55)

 Mixed

5 (5)

1 (2)

4 (8)

 Other (does not address an intervention or exposure)

24 (23)

18 (35)

6 (12)

Number of study designs included in the RRs, n (%)

 One

37 (36)

14 (27)

23 (45)

 Two or more

66 (64)

38 (73)

28 (55)

Frequency of included study designs, nb

 Systematic reviews

40

15

25

 Randomised controlled trials

41

17

24

 Observations studies (cohorts, case-control, cross-sectional)

61

36

25

 Otherc

37

21

16

 Unclear

40

28

12

Peer reviewed, n (%)

56 (54)

50 (96)d

6 (12)e

RRs publicly available, n (%)

86 (83)

36 (69)

50 (98)

Journal Impact Factor, median (inter-quartile range)[range]f

n/a

2 (1) [0.57–47.83]

n/a

Language of the RRs in English, n (%)

102 (99)

52 (100)

50 (98)

  1. RR rapid review
  2. aPer country
  3. bOther may qualitative, quasi-experimental design including interrupted time series, controlled before/after, case series etc.
  4. cDenotes the frequency of the included study designs
  5. dPeer review confirmed if journal listed on the DOAJ or if specifically stated as a policy of the journal
  6. eNon-journal-published RRs peer review status based on reporting of methods in each report and/or from available methods guidance from respective institutions
  7. fBased on unique journals (n = 47), of which 39 reported impact factors for 2016 (Additional file 2)