Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of participants in the different steps of the GCM process

From: Conceptualizing researchers’ perspectives on involving professionals in research: a group concept mapping study

 

Brainstorming

Organizing

n = 26 (%)

Sorting

n = 27 (%)

Rating I

n = 26 (%)

Rating II

n = 24 (%)

Sex

 Women

20 (76.9)

20 (74.1)

19 (73.1)

17 (70.8)

Academic level

 PhD student

4 (15.4)

4 (14.8)

4 (15.4)

4 (16.7)

 PhD

11 (42.3)

11 (40.7)

10 (38.5)

10 (41.7)

 Associate professor

5 (19.2)

7 (25.9)

7 (26.9)

5 (20.8)

 Professor

6 (23.1)

5 (18.5)

5 (19.2)

5 (20.8)

Research experience, in years

 1–4

3 (11.5)

3 (11.1)

3 (11.5)

3 (12.5)

 5–10

8 (30.8)

7 (25.9)

6 (23.1)

6 (25.0)

  ≥ 11

15 (57.7)

17 (63)

17 (65.4)

15 (62.5)

  1. Rating I: Rates on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much) the extent to which the statements can strengthen research involving professionals
  2. Rating II: Rates on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much) the extent to which the statements can strengthen practice in research involving professionals