Barrier | Review | Policy dialogue |
---|---|---|
A: Supportive process | ||
 Research priorities are not identified based on evidence of users' needs or by the administrative field | * | * |
 Lack of sufficient tools for identifying problems | * |  |
 Research results are not actively disseminated and/or they are disseminated inappropriately | * |  |
 Research results are not published in the users' appropriate language | * |  |
 Political barriers in publishing special research results | * |  |
B: The communication system | ||
 Lack of interaction between knowledge producers and users/administrative fields | * |  |
 As a bridge between knowledge producers and users, the research network plan has not been completely executed | * |  |
 Conflicts of interest between knowledge producers and decision-makers | * |  |
 Lack of trust between knowledge producers and decision-makers | * |  |
 The context of medical education integration has not been used to create a link between the university and the community |  | * |
C: The information system of the knowledge translation process | ||
 Absence of an appropriate database for identification of researchers | * |  |
 Absence of an appropriate databank for accessing research results | * |  |
 Inappropriate situation in data and information sharing in the system |  | * |
D: The supportive procedures of the knowledge translation process | ||
 Absence of an appropriate financial arrangement to produce the scientific evidence required | * |  |
 Inadequate financing of knowledge-dissemination activities | * |  |
 Absence of a clear-cut framework for applying a research result as evidence | * |  |
 Inefficiency of the health education system to help produce and uptake evidence |  | * |