Skip to main content

Table 3 Barriers to conducting economic evaluations of GCC countries (n = 53)

From: Barriers and facilitators to conducting economic evaluation studies of Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries: a survey of researchers

Statements

Strongly agree % (n)

Agree % (n)

Neutral % (n)

Disagree % (n)

Strongly disagree % (n)

Summary

Mean (SD)

Median

Absence of relevant health state preference to estimate QALYs

52.8 (28)

37.7 (20)

5.6 (3)

1.8 (1)

1.8 (1)

4.38 (0.8)

5

Restricted access to unit cost datasets to value healthcare resource use such as costs of medications or diagnostics

41.5 (22)

37.7 (20)

15.0 (8)

5.6 (3)

0.0 (0)

4.15 (0.9)

4

Lack of local effectiveness data

45.2 (24)

35.8 (19)

5.6 (3)

9.4 (5)

3.7 (2)

4.09 (1.1)

4

Lack of quality effectiveness data including missing information, incomplete coding and misclassification of variables

39.6 (21)

43.4 (23)

5.6 (3)

9.4 (5)

1.8 (1)

4.09 (1.0)

4

Lack of an independent society for economic evaluation experts where they can meet and share their thoughts and overcome challenges

41.5 (22)

37.7 (20)

11.3 (6)

7.5 (4)

1.8 (1)

4.09 (1.0)

4

Lack of routinely collected national health statistics such as mortality classified by disease states and prevalence

39.6 (21)

41.5 (22)

5.6 (3)

13.2 (7)

0.0 (0)

4.08 (1.0)

4

Lack of contact and interaction among decision-makers, researchers and other stakeholders

30.1 (16)

47.1 (25)

15.0 (8)

5.6 (3)

1.8 (1)

3.98 (0.9)

4

Lack of skilled support personnel such as research assistants and researcher coordinators

39.6 (21)

32.0 (17)

13.2 (7)

15.0 (8)

0.00 (0)

3.96 (1.1)

4

Restricted access to routinely collected national health statistics such as mortality classified by disease states and prevalence

33.9 (18)

39.6 (21)

13.2 (7)

13.2 (7)

0.0 (0)

3.94 (1.0)

4

Fragmentation of the healthcare system; i.e., services are spread across many providers, making estimation of costs and outcomes difficult

39.6 (21)

30.1 (16)

16.9 (9)

11.3 (6)

1.8 (1)

3.94 (1.1)

4

Lack of financial support to conduct economic evaluation

33.9 (18)

33.9 (18)

15.0 (8)

15.0 (8)

1.8 (1)

3.83 (1.1)

4

Limited qualified human resources to conduct economic evaluation research

33.9 (18)

33.9 (18)

15.0 (8)

15.0 (8)

1.8 (1)

3.83 (1.1)

4

Lack of information on healthcare resources used by patients such as types and numbers of medications dispensed or diagnostic procedures performed

28.3 (15)

45.2 (24)

5.6 (3)

20.7 (11)

0.0 (0)

3.81 (1.1)

4

Lack of research infrastructure to support researchers (modelling and simulation software, skilled librarians, biostatisticians, research assistants)

26.4 (14)

43.4 (23)

16.9 (9)

11.3 (6)

1.8 (1)

3.81 (1.0)

4

Lack of support as decision-makers are unwilling to use economic evaluation findings in the decision-making

33.9 (18)

28.3 (15)

18.8 (10)

16.9 (9)

1.8 (1)

3.75 (1.2)

4

No methodological guidelines for conducting economic evaluation that is relevant to my country

22.6 (12)

39.6 (21)

20.7 (11)

7.5 (4)

9.4 (5)

3.58 (1.2)

4

Lack of support as decision-makers lack confidence in economic evaluation findings

16.9 (9)

39.6 (21)

20.7 (11)

15.0 (8)

7.5 (4)

3.43 (1.2)

4

Lack of researchers’ awareness of funding opportunities

9.4 (5)

49.0 (26)

18.8 (10)

18.8 (10)

3.7 (2)

3.42 (1.0)

4

Lack of researchers’ motivation to conduct economic evaluation research

16.9 (9)

37.7 (20)

11.3 (6)

16.9 (9)

16.9 (9)

3.21 (1.4)

4

Insufficient dedicated time for conducing economic evaluation research

11.3 (6)

30.1 (16)

30.1 (16)

24.5 (13)

3.7 (2)

3.21 (1.1)

3

Difficulties in obtaining ethical approval

5.6 (3)

18.8 (10)

32.0 (17)

26.4 (14)

16.9 (9)

2.7 (1.1)

3