|
Q1 Support for these existing elements and changes to others would enable First Nations Australians’ self-determination to be recognized
|
|
80–100% support
|
|
Recognition and support for the role of Aboriginal community-controlled organizations is needed to ensure there is a First Nations Australia voice
|
|
Recognition that the First Nations Australian world view and collective identity is different from that of non-Indigenous Australians is needed throughout all processes
|
|
Constitutional recognition of First Nations Australians and a collectively decided voice to parliament are needed
|
|
Democratic processes embedded throughout the policy development system are needed
|
|
Treaty/ies between First Nations Australians and the state and Australian governments that recognize the sovereignty of First Nations Australians are needed
|
|
Change across the wider government and policy systems is needed to address and remove the structural determinants of healtha
|
|
Q2 There were a number of values identified that should underpin policy development processes for it to be seen as self-determination
|
|
80–100% support
|
|
The human rights of First Nations Australians are meaningfully considered
|
|
The human rights of First Nations Australians are protected
|
|
First Nations Australian culture and decision-making processes (consensus) are evident throughout the process
|
|
The process is informed by the priorities and needs of First Nations Australian community/ies that are affected/impacted
|
|
The diversity of First Nations Australians is recognized and accepted
|
|
There is improvement of First Nations Australian individuals’ and communities’ lives
|
|
The process is driven and directed by First Nations Australian leadership and governance
|
|
First Nations Australians have significant influence and power over the process
|
|
Q3 Self-determination in alcohol policy requires the policy-makers to use processes that ensure First Nations Australian/s…
|
|
80–100% support
|
|
Are given adequate time for decision-making
|
|
Receive feedback promptly and in a suitable format
|
|
Are involved in the codesign/co-development of policy
|
|
Are consulted early in the policy-making process
|
|
Have the opportunity to contribute to the policy-making process
|
|
Are involved in parts of the policy-making processa
|
|
Communities are able to hold the policy-makers accountable
|
|
Policy-makers can develop and build trust throughout
|
|
Are involved throughout the policy-making process
|
|
Are resourced and funded to be included at all stages
|
|
Two-way sharing (decision-making power and being informed of what has worked elsewhere)a,b
|
|
Are involved in evaluating the policy
|
|
Are involved in monitoring the policy
|
|
Local culture and language/s are considered and adjusted for in the policy-making process
|
|
Less than 80% support
|
|
Are involved in ALL data processes relating to alcohol policy (data sovereignty)b
|
|
Community/ies have autonomy in the policy-making process
|
|
Communities define the policy-making process
|
|
Communities can control the policy-making process throughout
|
|
Q4 Self-determination in alcohol policy development requires decision-making processes that…
|
|
80–100% support
|
|
Are participatory and transparent for all parties
|
|
Involve First Nations Australians
|
|
Are evaluated and monitored, with prompt response to feedback
|
|
Recognize the cultural obligations and expectations of First Nations Australians
|
|
Are adapted for local context
|
|
Are led by First Nations Australians
|
|
Are defined by First Nations Australians
|
|
Less than 80% support
|
|
Are not circumvented or changed at higher tiers of governmentb
|
|
Are democratic
|
|
Are balanced between the evidence base and community preferencesb
|
|
Are consensus-based
|
|
Give First Nations Australian communities/participants veto power at all levels
|
|
Give First Nations Australian community-controlled organizations collective veto power at all levelsb
|
|
Q6 At implementation, alcohol policy should include approaches that ensures it…
|
|
80–100% support
|
|
Is evaluated and monitored, with prompt response to feedback
|
|
Is not discriminatory against First Nations Australians’ human rights
|
|
Is respectful of the priorities of First Nations Australians and their communities
|
|
Involves First Nations Australians in the implementation decision-making
|
|
Results in the changes desired by the affected community/ies
|
|
Involves First Nations Australians in the resource allocation decision-making
|
|
Less than 80% support
|
|
Supports First Nations Australian leading service provision
|
|
Is translatable across the wider government and policy systems
|
