Skip to main content

Table 4 Number of university medical centres that mention indicators of robust and transparent science and traditional indicators of career progression in each of the included sources

From: Do German university medical centres promote robust and transparent research? A cross-sectional study of institutional policies

 

PhD regulation

(n = 37)

Habilitation regulation

(n = 35)

Tenure (application form)

(n = 25)

Tenure (procedural guideline)

(n = 11)

 

Any mention

Incentivised/required

Any mention

Incentivised/required

Any mention

Incentivised/required

Any mention

Incentivised/required

Indicators of robust/transparent science

Study registration

0% (0)

0% (0)

0% (0)

0% (0)

0% (0)

0% (0)

0% (0)

0% (0)

Reporting of results

8% (3)

3% (1)

3% (1)

3% (1)

0% (0)

0% (0)

0% (0)

0% (0)

Sharing of data/code/protocol

3% (1)

3% (1)

0% (0)

0% (0)

0% (0)

0% (0)

0% (0)

0% (0)

Open access

16% (6)

14% (5)

3% (1)

0% (0)

0% (0)

0% (0)

0% (0)

0% (0)

Robustness

3% (1)

3% (1)

0% (0)

0% (0)

0% (0)

0% (0)

0% (0)

0% (0)

Traditional indicators of career progression

Number of publications

100% (37)

100% (37)

91% (32)

80% (28)

0% (0)

0% (0)

27% (3)

9% (1)

Grant money

0% (0)

0% (0)

11% (4)

3% (1)

84% (21)

0% (0)

27% (3)

9% (1)

Impact factor

16% (6)

14% (5)

63% (24)

54% (19)

72% (18)

0% (0)

0% (0)

0% (0)

Authorship order

97% (36)

97% (36)

80% (28)

80% (28)

68% (17)

0% (0)

0% (0)

0% (0)

  1. The left column for each source indicates any mention of the indicator, and the right column for each source indicates indicators that are incentivised or required