Skip to main content

Table 4 Number of university medical centres that mention indicators of robust and transparent science and traditional indicators of career progression in each of the included sources

From: Do German university medical centres promote robust and transparent research? A cross-sectional study of institutional policies

  PhD regulation
(n = 37)
Habilitation regulation
(n = 35)
Tenure (application form)
(n = 25)
Tenure (procedural guideline)
(n = 11)
  Any mention Incentivised/required Any mention Incentivised/required Any mention Incentivised/required Any mention Incentivised/required
Indicators of robust/transparent science
Study registration 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0)
Reporting of results 8% (3) 3% (1) 3% (1) 3% (1) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0)
Sharing of data/code/protocol 3% (1) 3% (1) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0)
Open access 16% (6) 14% (5) 3% (1) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0)
Robustness 3% (1) 3% (1) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0)
Traditional indicators of career progression
Number of publications 100% (37) 100% (37) 91% (32) 80% (28) 0% (0) 0% (0) 27% (3) 9% (1)
Grant money 0% (0) 0% (0) 11% (4) 3% (1) 84% (21) 0% (0) 27% (3) 9% (1)
Impact factor 16% (6) 14% (5) 63% (24) 54% (19) 72% (18) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0)
Authorship order 97% (36) 97% (36) 80% (28) 80% (28) 68% (17) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0)
  1. The left column for each source indicates any mention of the indicator, and the right column for each source indicates indicators that are incentivised or required