Skip to main content

Table 5 Associations between location of authoring organization and perceived quality, stratified by sector of authoring organization

From: When the messenger is more important than the message: an experimental study of evidence use in francophone AfricaQuand le messager est plus important que le message: étude expérimentale en Afrique francophone sur l’utilisation des connaissances

 

β

Perceived quality

P value

[95% CI]

Donor organizations (financial authority)

 Intervention

 Location of authoring organization

   

  Europe or North America

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  Africa

0.510

[0.061 to 0.960]

0.027*

 Confounding variable

 Prior knowledge of the organization

   

  Does not know the organization

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  Knows the organization

0.413

[−0.473 to 1.300]

0.350

 Experience in the profession

0.084

[−0.180 to 0.348]

0.520

 Gender

  Male

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  Female

−0.171

[−0.658 to 0.317]

0.482

 Profession

  Health professionals

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  Other

−0.523

[−1.256 to 0.211]

0.157

  Coordination/management of programmes

−0.209

[−0.871 to 0.454]

0.454

  Research professionals

−0.591

[−1.441 to 0.260]

0.260

 Level of study

  University level less than or equal to first cycle

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  University level second cycle (MD)

0.505

[−0.231 to 1.241]

0.172

  University level postgraduate (PhD)

0.582

[−0.148 to 1.312]

0.114

 Region of graduation

  Europe or North America

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  Africa

0.377

[−0.130 to 0.883]

0.140

 

Value

R2

0.337

Adjusted R2

0.141

Regional offices of international organization (moral authority)

 Intervention

 Location of authoring organization

   

  Europe or North America

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  Africa

0.581

[−0.093 to 1.256]

0.089

 Confounding variable

 Prior knowledge of the organization

   

  Does not know the organization

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  Knows the organization

0.123

[−0.763 to 1.008]

0.780

 Experience in the profession

−0.361

[−0.714 to −0.009]

0.045*

 Gender

  Male

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  Female

−0.655

[−1.287 to −0.024]

0.042*

 Profession

  Health professionals

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  Other

0.207

[−1.062 to 1.477]

0.742

  Coordination/management of programmes

−0.590

[−1.612 to 0.442]

0.255

  Research professionals

−0.694

[−1.718 to 0.330]

0.177

 Level of study

  University level less than or equal to first cycle

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  University level second cycle (MD)

0.247

[−0.641 to 1.135]

0.576

  University level postgraduate (PhD)

−0.590

[−1.454 to 0.274]

0.174

 Region of graduation

  Europe or North America

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  Africa

0.655

[−0.982 to 1.409]

0.086

 

Value

R2

0.506

Adjusted R2

0.361

Universities (scientific authority)

 Intervention

 Location of authoring organization

   

  Europe or North America

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  Africa

−0.886

[−1.361 to −0.412]

0001*

 Confounding variable

 Prior knowledge of the organization

   

  Does not know the organization

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  Knows the organization

0.210

[−0.280 to 0.700]

0.393

 Experience in the profession

−0.124

[−0.334 to 0.086]

0.239

 Gender

  Male

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  Female

−0.056

[−0.629 to 0.516]

0.843

 Profession

  Health professionals

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  Other

−0.505

[−1.327 to 0.317]

0.222

  Coordination/management of programmes

−0.289

[−1.045 to 0.467]

0.446

  Research professionals

−0.287

[−1.101 to 0.438]

0.429

 Level of study

  University level less than or equal to first cycle

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  University level second cycle (MD)

−0.450

[−1.323 to 0.425]

0.305

  University level postgraduate (PhD)

−0.910

[−1.811 to −0.010]

0.048*

 Region of graduation

  Europe or North America

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  Africa

−0.039

[−0.639 to 0.560]

0.896

 

Value

R2

0.375

Adjusted R2

0.230