Skip to main content

Table 6 Associations between location of authoring organization and reported instrumental use of knowledge, stratified by sector of authoring organization

From: When the messenger is more important than the message: an experimental study of evidence use in francophone AfricaQuand le messager est plus important que le message: étude expérimentale en Afrique francophone sur l’utilisation des connaissances

 

β

Reported instrumental use

P value

[95% CI]

Donor organizations (financial authority)

 Intervention

 Location of authoring organization

   

  Europe or North America

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  Africa

0.373

[−0.119 to 0.865]

0.132

 Confounding variable

 Prior knowledge of the organization

   

  Does not know the organization

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  Knows the organization

1.064

[−0.906 to 2.219]

0.070

 Perceived autonomy in the profession

−0.010

[−0.203 to 0.182]

0.913

 Experience in the profession

0.239

[0.040 to 0.617]

0.027

 Gender

  Male

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  Female

−0.582

[−1.100 to −0.641]

0.029*

 Profession

  Health professionals

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  Other

−0.793

[−1.632 to 0.464]

0.063

  Coordination/management of programmes

−0.381

[−1.116 to 0.535]

0.298

  Research professionals

−0.505

[−1.410 to 0.400]

0.264

 Level of study

  University level less than or equal to first cycle

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  University level second cycle (MD)

0.150

[−0.639 to 0.940]

0.701

  University level postgraduate (PhD)

−0.279

[−1.052 to 0.493]

0.466

 Region of graduation

  Europe or North America

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

  Africa

1.099

[0.574 to 1.624]

0.000*

 

Value

R2

0.644

Adjusted R2

0.518

Regional offices of international organization (moral authority)

 Intervention

 Location of authoring organization

   

 Europe or North America

   

  Africa

0.458

[−0.074 to 0.990]

0.089

 Confounding variable

 Prior knowledge of the organization

   

  Does not know the organization

   

  Knows the organization

0.225

[−0.464 to 0.915]

0.510

 Perceived autonomy in the profession

−0.010

[−0.227 to 0.208]

0.928

 Experience in the profession

−0.368

[−0.638 to −0.098]

0.009*

 Gender

  Male

   

  Female

−0.470

[−0.952 to 0.011]

0.055

 Profession

  Health professionals

   

  Other

−0.248

[−1.214 to 0.718]

0.605

  Coordination/management of programmes

−0.856

[−1.643 to −0.068]

0.034*

  Research professionals

−0.962

[−1.762 to −1.162]

0.020*

 Level of study

  University level less than or equal to first cycle

   

  University level second cycle (MD)

−0.357

[−1.075 to 0.296]

0.256

  University level postgraduate (PhD)

−0.449

[−1.123 to 0.225]

0.184

 Region of graduation

  Europe or North America

   

  Africa

0.357

[−0.230 to 0.944]

0.225

 

Value

R2

0.549

Adjusted R2

0.394

Universities (scientific authority)

 Intervention

 Location of authoring organization

   

  Europe or North America

   

  Africa

−0.670

[−1.265 to −0.748]

0.028*

 Confounding variable

 Prior knowledge of the organization

  Does not know the organization

   

  Knows the organization

0.038

[−0.601 to 0.677]

0.906

 Perceived autonomy in the profession

0.183

[−0.068 to 0.435]

0.148

 Experience in the profession

−0.057

[−0.325 to 0.211]

0.669

 Gender

  Male

   

  Female

−0.185

[−0.905 to 0.536]

0.608

 Profession

  Health professionals

   

  Other

−0.325

[−1.360 to 0.710]

0.530

  Coordination/management of programmes

−0.538

[−1.493 to 0.417]

0.262

  Research professionals

−0.514

[−1.441 to 0.412]

0.269

 Level of study

  University level less than or equal to first cycle

   

  University level second cycle (MD)

−0.299

[−1.403 to 0.804]

0.587

  University level postgraduate (PhD)

−0.316

[−1.453 to 0.820]

0.577

 Region of graduation

  Europe or North America

   

  Africa

0.530

[−0.270 to 1.330]

0.188

 

Value

R2

0.313

Adjusted R2

0.129