Skip to main content

Table 1 Concepts of knowledge user engagement as described by Jull et al. [7]

From: A scoping review to identify and describe the characteristics of theories, models and frameworks of health research partnerships

Concept

Description of collaborative research process

Researcher: prepare, support

Initiate/support researcher capacity/behaviour for power-sharing, expertise, engagement—includes language and knowledge differences, learning (e.g. attending meetings with community groups, volunteering and working with groups to understand knowledge user perspectives)

Knowledge user: prepare, support

Initiate/support knowledge user/community organizational capacity/behaviour for power-sharing, expertise, engagement (e.g. develop resource manual, provide training in research methods)

Relational process

Initiate and/or sustain a relational process (relationship-building) between knowledge user–researcher to promote respect, reciprocity, trust and partnership synergy

Research agenda

Engage in a process to define study agenda: scope, priorities, objective(s)

Ethics: principles/values

Conduct knowledge user–researcher partnership work in an ethical way demonstrated by reflection on ethical concepts and/or concern with particular values, and research conducted in ways reported as meaningful, respectful, inclusive of those in the research partnership. Evidence of principled (versus policy, rules) research conduct

Research questions

Define research questions to identify what, specifically, the research project aims to achieve to justify the need to conduct the research (i.e. how/why was this topic chosen? What gap will it fill?)

Resources

Develop funding applications/grant proposals for and/or to obtain resources (e.g. funding, time) to support knowledge user–researcher engagement

Ethics: policy/rules

Conduct knowledge user–research partnership work in an ethical way demonstrated by participation in an ethical application development (e.g. writing consent forms), review (e.g. research ethics board, community review) and/or development and/or use of an ethical framework (e.g. knowledge user role in the use of particular protocols, processes)

Methodology

Decide on the research methodology (approach) or report process to justify the use of the proposed methodology

Methods

Decide upon research methods and a justification for the use of the proposed methods; selection of outcome measures

Collect data

Collect data and include tool development

Analysis

Decide about the analysis and interpretation of data (e.g. what form of analysis and how it will be conducted)

Disseminate

Identify the appropriate audience to disseminate the research findings and tailor the message and medium to the audience to create tangible products (e.g. publication of findings, community meetings)

Evaluate

Evaluate the research study processes

Sustain

Maintain study benefits at a certain rate, level [i.e. make deliberate efforts to sustain study intervention(s)]