Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of included model or framework (n = 39)

From: A scoping review to identify and describe the characteristics of theories, models and frameworks of health research partnerships

Study (country)

Year

Title

Intended users

Theoretical underpinning

Methodology

Figure or table

de Crespigny et al. [48] (Australia)

2004

Partnership model for ethical Indigenous research

Researchers partnering with Aboriginal groups

NR

NR

Figure

Bernier et al. [47] (Canada)

2006

NR

Between university chairs and partners

NR

NR

Table

Hewlett et al. [50] (United Kingdom)

2006

FIRST model

NR

NR

NR

Table

Anderson et al. [43] (United States)

2007

Partnership model

NR

NR

NR

Figure

McKay et al. [55] (United States)

2007

NR

NR

NR

NR

Figure

Silka et al. [58] (United States)

2008

Working Together model

Any type of research partnership

NR

NR

Figure

Wallerstein et al. [59] (United States)

2008

NR

NR

NR

NR

Figure

Jones et al. [52] (United States)

2009

Circle of Influence Model

NR

NR

NR

Figure

Warburton et al. [60] (Australia)

2009

NR

Researchers partnering with adults/older populations

NR

NR

NR

Abma and Broerse [41] (Netherlands)

2010

Dialogue model

NR

NR

NR

NR

James et al. [51] (United States)

2011

NR

NR

NR

Qualitative

Figure

Lindau et al. [53] (United States)

2011

NR

Large-scale health research partnerships

NR

NR

Both

Andrews et al. [44] (United States)

2012

CBPR Partnership Readiness Model

NR

NR

Qualitative

Figure

Baquet [45] (United States)

2012

NR

Partnerships between academic health centres and communities

Sociological framework, empowerment theory

NR

Figure

Sadler et al. [56] (United States)

2012

NR

Any type of research partnership

NR

NR

Table

Allen et al. [42] (United States)

2013

NR

NR

NR

NR

Table

Baquet et al. [46] (United States)

2013

NR

Partnerships between academic health centres and rural communities

NR

NR

Table

Deverka et al. [49] (United States)

2013

NR

NR

NR

NR

Figure

Martin del Campo et al. [54] (United States)

2013

BxCRRB model

NR

NR

NR

NR

Shippee et al. [57] (United States)

2013

NR

Patient and service user engagement research

NR

NR

Figure

CIHR [61] (Canada)

2014

Patient Engagement Framework

SPOR partners

NR

NR

Figure

Frank et al. [62] (United States)

2015

NR

Patient engagement research

NR

NR

Figure

King et al. [63] (United States)

2015

Community–academic partnership framework

NR

NR

Qualitative

Figure

Tse et al. [64] (United States)

2015

NR

NR

NR

Qualitative

Figure

Belone et al. [65] (United States)

2016

NR

NR

Socio-ecological framework

NR

Figure

McNeil et al. [67] (Canada)

2016

NR

Researchers partnering with older adults

NR

NR

Figure

Di Lorito et al. [68] (United Kingdom)

2017

NR

Researchers partnering with people with dementia

NR

NR

Table

Sheridan et al. [69] (United States)

2017

PCORI Engagement Rubric

Researchers apply for PCOR funding or any type of engaged research

NR

Qualitative

Figure

Corbie-Smith et al. [70] (United States)

2018

Engaged scholarship ethics framework

NR

NR

NR

Both

Dave et al. [71] (United States)

2018

NR

Community–academic partnerships

NR

Mixed Methods

Table

Gousse et al. [72] (United States)

2018

3Ps framework

Researchers partnering with Black, heterosexual men with HIV (or comparable group)

NR

NR

NR

Hamilton et al. [73] (Canada)

2018

PEIR framework

NR

NR

Qualitative

Table

Jull et al. [66] (Canada)

2018

NR

NR

NR

NR

Figure

Evans et al. [74] (United Kingdom)

2019

SUCCESS model

Researchers partnering with carers of and/or individuals with chronic conditions

NR

NR

Table

Key et al. [75] (United States)

2019

NR

NR

NR

NR

Figure

Swarbrick et al. [76] (United Kingdom)

2019

COINED Model

Researchers partnering with people with dementia

NR

NR

Figure

Di Lorito et al. [77] (United Kingdom)

2020

NR

Researchers partnering with carers of people with dementia or with members of the public

NR

Qualitative

Figure

Roche et al. [78] (Canada)

2020

Valuing All Voices Framework

Patient engagement research

NR

Qualitative

Both

Ward et al. [79] (Canada)

2020

NR

Non-Innu researchers partnering with Innu communities or any Indigenous community

NR

NR

Both

  1. BxCRRB Bronx Community Research Review Board, CIHR Canadian Institutes of Health Research, COINED CO-Researcher INvolvement and Engagement in Dementia, FIRST facilitate, identify, respect, support and train, NR not reported, PCOR patient-centred outcomes research, PEIR patient engagement in research, SPOR Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research, SUCCESS Service Users with Chronic Conditions Encouraging Sensible Solutions