Table 3 Methods utilized to develop model or framework (n = 39)

de Crespigny et al. [48]

●

●

●

●

Bernier et al. [47]

●

●

Hewlett et al. [50]

●

●

Conferences

Anderson [43]

Mckay et al. [55]

Silka et al. [58]

●

Needs assessment

Wallerstein et al. [59]

●

Jones et al. [52]

Warburton et al. [60]

●

Abma and Broerse [41]

●

●

Case studies

James et al. [51]

●

●

Lindau et al. [53]

●

Andrews et al. [44]

●

●

Baquet [45]

Sadler et al. [56]

●

●

Allen et al. [42]

●

Baquet et al. [46]

●

●

Strategic planning process

Deverka et al. [49]

●

Practical experience from a partnership

Martin del Campo et al. [54]

●

●

Conference calls, site visit

Shippee et al. [57]

●

Environmental scan, manual search of literature

CIHR [61]

●

Frank et al. [62]

●

King et al. [63]

●

●

Tse et al. [64]

●

●

Belone et al. [65]

●

McNeil et al. [67]

●

●

●

Grey literature search, realist synthesis

Di Lorito et al. [68]

●

Sheridan et al. [69]

●

Review of applications to PCOR to identify exemplar practices to guide development of rubric

Corbie-Smith et al. [70]

●

●

●

●

Dave et al. [71]

●

Gousse et al. [72]

Hamilton et al. [73]

Jull et al. [66]

●

Evans et al. [74]

●

●

●

Normative group technique, email discussions

Key et al. [75]

Observations of community and academic partners, community dialogue sessions

Swarbrick et al. [76]

●

●

Di Lorito et al. [77]

Personal reflections

Roche et al. [78]

●

●

Ward et al. [79]

Total

11

1

8

9

2

5

10

3