Table 7 Status of family-planning methods used by female and male street-dwellers
Use of familyplanning methods | Females | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||
Baseline | Endline | % of difference | Baseline | Endline | % of difference | |
(n = 194) No. (%) | (n = 188) No. (%) | (n = 190) No. (%) | (n = 190) No. (%) | |||
Used methods | 68 (35) | 126 (67)** | 32 | 34 (18) | 89 (47) ** | 29 |
Type of method used | ||||||
Temporary | 20 (30) | 29 (23) | 7 | 17 (51) | 43 (48) | 3 |
Semi-permanent | 38 (55) | 76 (60) | 5 | 8 (23) | 31 (36) | 13 |
Permanent | 8 (12) | 17 (14) | 2 | 6 (17) | 11 (12) | -5 |
Traditional | 2 (3) | 4 (3) | 0 | 3 (9) | 4 (4) | 5 |
Males | ||||||
Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||
Baseline (n = 167) No. (%) | Endline (n = 176) No. (%) | % of difference | Baseline (n = 165) No. (%) | Endline (n = 76) No. (%) | % of difference | |
Used methods | 55 (33) | 136 (77)** | 44 | 50 (30) | 31 (41) | 11 |
Type of method used | ||||||
Temporary | 29 (52) | 73 (54) | 2 | 24(48) | 13 (41) | 7 |
Semi-permanent | 22 (41) | 53 (39) | -2 | 16 (32) | 15 (47) | 15 |
Permanent | 4 (7) | 10 (7) | 0 | 10 (20) | 3 (12) | -8 |
Traditional | 0 | 0 | 1(2) | 0 | ||