No. of authors | First author | Second | Third | Fourth | Fifth |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(A) Monotonic scheme proposed by Howard et al.[6]. | |||||
1 | 1.0000 | ||||
2 | 0.6000 | 0.4000 | |||
3 | 0.4737 | 0.3158 | 0.2105 | ||
4 | 0.4154 | 0.2769 | 0.1846 | 0.1231 | |
5 | 0.3839 | 0.2559 | 0.1706 | 0.1137 | 0.0758 |
(B) FLAE scheme proposed by Tscharntke et al.[8]. | |||||
1 | 1.0000 | ||||
2 | 0.66667 | 0.33333 | |||
3 | 0.54545 | 0.18182 | 0.27273 | ||
4 | 0.50000 | 0.12500 | 0.12500 | 0.25000 | |
5 | 0.47619 | 0.09524 | 0.09524 | 0.09524 | 0.23810 |
(C) FLAE scheme proposed by Ellwein et al.[3]. | |||||
1 | 1.0000 | ||||
2 | 0.5556 | 0.4444 | |||
3 | 0.3846 | 0.3077 | 0.3077 | ||
4 | 0.3086 | 0.2469 | 0.1975 | 0.2469 | |
5 | 0.2577 | 0.2062 | 0.1649 | 0.1649 | 0.2062 |
(D) FLAE scheme proposed in the present study. For more than two authors, the first author is assigned 50% of the credit, the last author 30%, and the also-rans have the remaining 20% divided between them. | |||||
1 | 1.0000 | ||||
2 | 0.7000 | 0.3000 | |||
3 | 0.5000 | 0.2000 | 0.3000 | ||
4 | 0.5000 | 0.1000 | 0.1000 | 0.3000 | |
5 | 0.5000 | 0.0667 | 0.0667 | 0.0667 | 0.3000 |