Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 Dec 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 26 Jan 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Kennedy |
| 10 Feb 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christopher Henshall |
| 20 Feb 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sarah Robinson |
| 17 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Stephen Robert Hanney |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 17 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 17 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Stephen Robert Hanney |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 17 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 29 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Stephen Robert Hanney |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 29 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| 10 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Stephen Robert Hanney |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 10 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 13 May 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 13 May 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1478-4505-8-11 |
You can find further information about peer review here.