Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
16 Sep 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
30 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Henry Lucas |
23 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Robert Hanney |
28 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Tracey Koehlmoos |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
28 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
21 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Tracey Koehlmoos |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
21 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
25 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Tracey Koehlmoos |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
25 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
6 Apr 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
6 Apr 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1478-4505-8-8 |
You can find further information about peer review here.